A Crusader For Justice
Rangayakamma is an Institution
H T
Ranganayakamma,
commonly known as
RN, stands out as a transformative figure in promoting Marxist thought, democratic ideals, and anti-caste principles through her remarkably clear and engaging writing style. A trailblazer in literary innovation, her works span a broad array of topics, from critiques of Indian mythology and revivalism to discussions on civil liberties, the Indian Communist Movement, and Maoism in China.
This year marks the 50th anniversary of her seminal piece on Ramayana. Then she turned 85 this year on September 21st. Incidentally Ranganayakamma has never celebrated her birth day. In this connection her observation as published in the ‘Andhra Jyothy’ [20-2-2021] is self-revealing: ‘In fact, Birthday is simply a method of calculating age. If a person considers his birthday a day of celebration, why celebrate once a year? He must celebrate it every day. Birthday is like yesterday! Like tomorrow’.
Her fearless approach to writing is akin to a ship bravely navigating through tumultuous waters, tirelessly pushing back against dogmatism and infusing Marxism with fresh vigour.
Born on September 21, 1939, in Bommidi village, Andhra Pradesh, RN’s family background was steeped in literary culture. Her father, Lakshmi Satyanarayanayya, ran a small printing press and published a caste-oriented magazine called “Padma Nayaka”, while her mother, Lakshmi Narasamma, was a housewife. RN is the eldest of six siblings, with one brother and three younger sisters.
RN’s literary journey began in the late 1950s, when she started receiving letters from readers discussing an array of social, economic, political, and cultural topics, including personal issues for which they sought her advice. She contributed regular columns to various popular magazines, such as “Prajatantra” and *”Andhra Jyothy”, addressing reader queries. Her compilation, “My Acquaintance with Some Readers,” captures the diverse impressions from her correspondence and interactions. “Connection to Marxism.” In 1974, RN aligned herself with Marxist ideology, starting with her influential work, “Ramayana Vishavruksham”.
Alongside fellow intellectuals, she joined the Unity Centre of Communist Revolutionaries of India (Marxist–Leninist), resonating with its political documents. However, after experiencing isolation from the group and ideological conflicts within Jana Saahithi, an organisation formed in 1978, she resigned in 1979. Subsequently, RN opted to publish her work independently, maintaining her Marxist perspective without associating with any specific Communist group.
In 1965, the Sahitya Academy awarded RN a prize for her novel “Balipeetham”. Initially unaware of the political significance of such accolades, she later understood that honours often supported prevailing social norms, which do not necessarily challenge the ruling class’s interests. Following her embrace of Marxism, she declined various awards, voicing her critical views on accolades in several writings. For instance, her critique of KalipatnamRamarao’s acclaimed story “Yagnyam” revealed how its themes undermined the interests of the impoverished.
RN’s analysis of scriptures like the Ramayana and Mahabharata reveals her commitment to rationalism and social progress.
RN pioneered translations of English novels into Telugu, starting with “Spartacus”, “Freedom Road”, and “Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. Her efforts in translating Charles Bettelheim’s works further enriched Telugu literature, as she produced valuable insights to help readers connect with the political and theoretical contexts of Bettelheim’s analyses.
An unwavering critic of religious mythologies, RN’s analysis of scriptures like the Ramayana and Mahabharata reveals her commitment to rationalism and social progress. Her extensive critique, “Ramayana Vishavruksham,” argues against the feudal and exploitative elements in the text, drawing considerable attention to the socio-economic implications of its narratives.
RN’s writing is celebrated for its lucidity, empowering her to communicate complex ideas to readers from various backgrounds. Her criticism of convoluted Marxist texts illuminated the need for accessible language, as exemplified in her essay “Are We Writing in Colloquial Language?” which sought to reshape journalistic writing into a more reader-friendly format.
The issue of caste has long been a contentious topic within the Indian Communist movement, sparking ongoing debates between Ambedkarism and Marxism. A significant ideological current suggests a potential convergence between these two perspectives. In her book ‘Caste and Class: A Marxist Viewpoint’, RN articulately lays out the radical solutions that Ambedkar proposes for addressing the caste issue and the goal of its annihilation.
She skilfully counters the criticisms from Dalit intellectuals who argue that Marxists overlook the caste question and fail to honour Ambedkar, providing a Marxist interpretation of caste and refuting Ambedkar’s ideas. Most of the articles in this collection are polemical pieces that respond to the critiques and accusations directed at the Marxist analysis of caste, particularly those raised against her writings.
While RN’s critiques are rooted in a Marxist framework, her critics note, she has at times exhibited an eclectic approach that raises questions about her understanding of revolutionary practices. Her analyses of figures like Chairman Mao highlight her singular focus on failures without sufficiently acknowledging the broader socio-political contexts and complexities involved, they insist.
This tendency to overly scrutinise individuals rather than systems can sometimes overshadow the contributions of those within the revolutionary movements. In closing, Ranganayakamma is a quintessential figure whose works continue to inspire and provoke thought among new generations of readers. Her distinct voice and courageous critique of societal norms make her an essential part of India’s intellectual landscape.
Back to Home Page
Frontier
Vol 57, No. 20, Nov 10 - 16, 2024 |