| 
                
                
                 Letters 
                Dr Ram Puniyani 80 
                  I am two days late in congratulating Dr Ram  Puniyani as he crossed eighty springs on mother Earth. I came to know by a Post  from Dr Suresh Khairnar, Nagpur on the 26 August about this cheering news. 
                Dr Ram Puniyani is in one sense our collective conscience keeper.  I met him personally only once till NOW, in Ghataprabha, Karnataka, July 2023. 
                It was an assembly of civil rights activists preparing themselves  for the ensuing electoral campaigns. Dr. Ram was the maiden speaker there.  Hearing him was a privilege for me in understanding the deep social roots of  communal passion, legacy of Hindutva in this land of Hindustani  Society, carrying the festering aching wound of Partition among us along  the communal lines of religiosity. 
                Dr Ram spoke on these subjects in the Marx Forum sessions, his was  the maiden presentation when we held a series of discussions on “Religion,  Spirituality, Secularism, Communalism” spanning over a year from May 2023. Overall,  nineteen speakers presented their views in eight such virtual sessions. Dr Ram  is relentless in his struggle against communal passion, firm on his  interpretation of secular ideals that do NOT eschew or abandon religious  culture, beliefs just for the sake of accepting modernity as it is  interpreted by the prevailing culture under the rule of Capital. 
                Dr Ram is a spiritual Human among us. 
                    Arun Kumar Sinha 
                East Bengal Football Club Protests 
                  Identity has always been central to the  football universe. Team allegiances have the power to unite nations, divide  societies, and spark rivalries that fuel passion as much as they unleash  violence. The Italian Marxist philosopher and politician Antonio Gramsci  famously described the sport as an “open-air kingdom of human loyalty”. 
                This sentiment was vividly echoed in a massive banner put up in the  colours of East Bengal Football Club at a recent Durand Cup match in Kolkata.  It read: “Bharat Swadhin korte shedin porechhilam phaansi/ Maaer bhasha bolchhi  boley aajke Bangladeshi?” (That day we wore the hangman’s noose for our  country’s independence/Today we are being labelled Bangladeshi for speaking in  our mother tongue?). It highlighted not just the burning issue of migrant  Bengali-speaking labourers being targeted as “Bangladeshi” in different parts  of the country but also the deeply wounded sentiment of people whose  forefathers bore the pains of Partition less than 80 years ago. 
                    A Reader 
                Recognising Palestine 
                  Keir Starmer and the 150 other states have  recognised the State of Palestine. But this is an overdue act of reparation. As  Starmer himself acknowledged it was the British mandate that allowed the  establishment of the state of Israel 75 years ago. We must remember the  Sykes-Picot documents, easily available online, whereby on January 3, 1916 the  Holy Land was the only area allowed to bear arms, by the very European nations  that are involved in today’s recognition. We must place this within a broad  geopolitical rhythm that has existed millennially. What the Sykes-Picot merely  organised was the resettlement of the map of West Asia (Middle East) after the  dissolution of the Ottoman Empire at the conclusion of the First World War That  story of power reshuffling is broader than Israel and has not come to an end.  We must all strive to preserve the possibilities by Britain, Canada, Australia,  and the European Nations today, recognise that it is not Palestine that wishes  destruction of the state of Israel, but rather the policy of Prime Minister  Netanyahu in Gaza that makes it clear that it is the other way around: in his  view, Palestine must not exist for Israel to survive. We must undo this. There  is of course a great deal written on specifically the history and tradition of  Palestine, but for the best impartial account we go to the work of Rashid  Khalidi. For a quick catch up for those who need it, I recommend Khalidi’s “The  Neck and the Sword” [The New Left Review 147, May-June 2024]. 
                  GayatriChakravortySpivak FBA 
                  University  Professor 
                  Columbia  University 
                ‘The Bengal Files’  
                  “Although I haven’t seen `The Bengal Files’  film, I can make out from the reviews that it is a one sided narrative heavily  weighted against the Muslim perpetrators of the Great Calcutta Killings, while  ignoring the equally notorious role of the Hindu fanatics in the massacre of  innocent Muslims. I as a ten year old lad in August 1946 was an eye-witness to  the events of those days in our neighbourhood Ballygunge in south Calcutta.  Following the Muslim League call for Direct Action, the Hindu religious organisation  Bharat SevasramSangh held a public meeting at Ekdalia Park opposite our house.  A saffron clad sannyasi gave a fiery speech asking Hindus to rise and take  revenge against Muslims. Soon after that, a crowd from that meeting raided a  shop of an old Muslim woman on Ekdalia Road from where she used to sell eggs  and other provisions, and set it on fire. Luckily, the old woman had earlier  left the shop closing it fearing attacks. What followed was worse. The next  morning, some Hindu goondas of our area, led by one Chitta, gathered around the  railway lines of Ballygunge station. From our balcony I could see them beating  with their lathis some people lying on the railway lines. Later, we came to  know that the victims were Muslims, who were trying to cross the railway lines  to escape to the other side. 
                  Sumanta Banerjee 
                  Hyderabad 
             
                    
                 
                 Back to Home Page 
                 Frontier 
                  Vol 58, No. 18,     Oct 26 - Nov 1, 2025                   |